Austria

2017

Environmental benefit

120.000 m2 of nearly-zero energy buildings supplied by locally-generated renewable heat

Renewable heating strategy for a new development area

Share

R-ACES Logo with baseline horizontal

Renewable heating strategy for a new development area

Austria

2017

Environmental benefit

120.000 m2 of nearly-zero energy buildings supplied by locally-generated renewable heat

Discover this use case online

This case study covers the investigation of renewable heat supply options for the new development area «Teilraum 31» in Ansfelden. The area is mainly owned by the municipality which, therefore, can define priorities regarding energy efficiency and renewable energy. The new development area could include ca. 120,000 m2. According to the current planning strategy, it will be used for different types of buildings – mainly residential ones, and could reach a plot ratio of 0,45 to 0,55 per building lot. The expected buildings consist of around 100 single-family houses, 200 row houses and 10 small multi-family houses.

The scenarios and policy assessments led to the following results:
• In the studied case, without policies, the cheapest option to supply heat is a biomass only network accompanied by a heat storage of 100 m3.
• The calculations showed that with additional heat costs of around +7 % (with subsidies) to +10.5 % (without subsidies), solar fractions of 15 % can be generated by installing solar thermal collectors and up to 42 % by installing solar PV that drives a heat pump. This could reduce the biomass demand by up to 40 %.
• When assuming considerably lower installation costs for solar thermal collectors (e.g. ground mounted instead of roof mounted collectors), the heat generation costs are similar to those of the biomass-only boiler for solar shares up to 25 %. Therefore, emphasis should be put on attempting to reduce investment costs for solar thermal collectors by installing bigger units and using synergies when building a new development area.
• Both solar thermal collectors and a heat pump + PV require additional investments. Certain conditions could make these options more interesting such as higher energy prices or running the heat pump on electricity purchased from the grid when excess electricity from the PV can be fed into the grid.
• The results of the analysis show that under certain conditions, higher shares of solar heat can be integrated at lower costs with the combination of central heat pump and PV than with solar thermal collectors.

Recommendations and possible solutions
For the new development area, the folowing policy recommendations should be considered:
• Using existing national and regional financial support schemes for DH network and RES Subsidies up to 50% of the total investment costs and low-interest rates are already available from the national and regional programs for investment into district heating network infrastructure and RES installations – including biomass boiler, solar thermal collectors and heat pumps
• An integrated planning approach can be enabled by:
– Providing free audits and advice to building owners within potential expansion areas
– Providing additional resources to the local urban development office
– Special marketing campaigns and promotional activities
– Including local housing associations and private renter in strategy development.

R-ACES has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N° 892429

This case study covers the investigation of renewable heat supply options for the new development area «Teilraum 31» in Ansfelden. The area is mainly owned by the municipality which, therefore, can define priorities regarding energy efficiency and renewable energy. The new development area could include ca. 120,000 m2. According to the current planning strategy, it will be used for different types of buildings – mainly residential ones, and could reach a plot ratio of 0,45 to 0,55 per building lot. The expected buildings consist of around 100 single-family houses, 200 row houses and 10 small multi-family houses.

The scenarios and policy assessments led to the following results:
• In the studied case, without policies, the cheapest option to supply heat is a biomass only network accompanied by a heat storage of 100 m3.
• The calculations showed that with additional heat costs of around +7 % (with subsidies) to +10.5 % (without subsidies), solar fractions of 15 % can be generated by installing solar thermal collectors and up to 42 % by installing solar PV that drives a heat pump. This could reduce the biomass demand by up to 40 %.
• When assuming considerably lower installation costs for solar thermal collectors (e.g. ground mounted instead of roof mounted collectors), the heat generation costs are similar to those of the biomass-only boiler for solar shares up to 25 %. Therefore, emphasis should be put on attempting to reduce investment costs for solar thermal collectors by installing bigger units and using synergies when building a new development area.
• Both solar thermal collectors and a heat pump + PV require additional investments. Certain conditions could make these options more interesting such as higher energy prices or running the heat pump on electricity purchased from the grid when excess electricity from the PV can be fed into the grid.
• The results of the analysis show that under certain conditions, higher shares of solar heat can be integrated at lower costs with the combination of central heat pump and PV than with solar thermal collectors.

Recommendations and possible solutions
For the new development area, the folowing policy recommendations should be considered:
• Using existing national and regional financial support schemes for DH network and RES Subsidies up to 50% of the total investment costs and low-interest rates are already available from the national and regional programs for investment into district heating network infrastructure and RES installations – including biomass boiler, solar thermal collectors and heat pumps
• An integrated planning approach can be enabled by:
– Providing free audits and advice to building owners within potential expansion areas
– Providing additional resources to the local urban development office
– Special marketing campaigns and promotional activities
– Including local housing associations and private renter in strategy development.